PROLOGUE

What do you know of the cosmos...? What you've been told..?

So do you believe you're a hologram projection from a black hole..?

Do you believe you can slip through a worm hole to Andromeda in a split second..?

Do you believe you are doing slightly different things in a billion other universes..?

Don't worry if not... You're not alone.  Many scientists don't believe any of it either.  Some of it is hard to even imagine.  But the math says they're possible.  These and other just as weird ideas are called 'theoretically possible'.  But of course they're not.  It's just the math running wild using bad posits like Time. As if time ran the universe. It does not..!

The whole point of this book is to say that time and space time do not exist. I would prove it but one cannot prove a negative. That Einstein was wrong. But we do have the exact replacement for time. It has been there all the time. :) The true classic physical physics means, not an analogy., and it works better too.

Humans are, after all, just human. :) They only know what they want to know, and often disregard what they can't comprehend.  If it's too low to measure, it doesn't exist.  If they can't see it, it doesn't exist.  If they can't explain it, they make an exception, a rule, or cosmological constant to cover it.  This is what mainstream science does now, because, for the most part, they're human too. 

We have earth bound points of view.  We evolved senses needed to survive on this planet.  There was no need to know of things beyond our control.   Those of no concern or threat to our survival.  Things we are only now starting to suspect or become aware of in various ways.  But even that awareness is suspect.  It seems we're seeing things that aren't really there.  With measurements and such being made with our earth bound instruments and interpreted with our earth bound ideas and imaginations. 

You who are reading this are not a hologram projection from a black hole.  There is no time travel because there is no time. Neither are there multiple dimensions nor other spin off sci-fi story lines from thinking time exists.  

So we have removed what is totally imagined.., but our neo mainstream science still wants to believes in.   Time…  A non scientific concept, made up to cover the link to relativity Einstein could not find.  It is not science at all.  The reason his idea is still called a theory.  It will always be called a theory since time is not provable.  And similar to many such faith based beliefs, we see it becoming a religion in the scientific world, and Einstein its God.  Faith may have its place but in real science it does not. One cannot see it, measure it, touch it, or smell it.  Nothing…  It is just not there.  Time is simply a close analogy to what is truly happening. 

This book is to explain what does make it work.  Up until now, it's been a case of not seeing the forest for the trees.  But science has learned a lot in the more than 120 years since Einstein put his analogy into the cosmos. What follows is what I've read, studied, understand, and re-considered of that new knowledge for at least the past 60 of those 100+  years.   

There is no math or other so called proofs here that I'm told are needed for my thoughts to be accepted by the scientific community.   Mostly because much of it has already been done by others elsewhere and I'm simply using their results.  Even if I did produce it, the other requirement is that one must be a *professional* physics/cosmologist researcher/instructor, etc.., before anything written would even looked at.   My response to that is Freud did not go to college to become a psychiatrist.  Some people can just make sense of things on their own.

In any case.., this book was meant to be small, to simply point out certain known facts of physics that will bring about a clear and simple explanation for everything that one applies them too, if they want to do that. 

Knowing the current theories are full of holes we looked for better answers. As we researched, we realized that much of what is known is not taken seriously, not seen fully, or simply not being interpreted correctly because of one's belief in time. Please understand we are not arguing any real science findings otherwise. We're simply trying to put the real dots their correct order for a much better prespective.

Staying within the established guide lines of known science we have looked beyond earth-bound limits to be sure our conclusions apply equally here on earth and to the cosmos overall.

Many misinterpretations are made because of this earth-bound point of view.  Our human frame of mind.  Our relativity in the cosmos.  Our not so very finely tuned senses, imagination, and mentalities, evolved to only know sights, sounds, and smells for our survival here on earth.  We did not need to know of aether and such.  We never evolved a need to know an atom at the tip of our finger can affect an atom in another galaxy.  But it seems the cosmos does.  And I can imagine it because math and reason both say that division by zero is impossible.  And likewise how can you reach zero by continually dividing a number by four...?  That being the distance squared dissipation rate of gravity.   

So we will progress through the following chapters and thought as though they are absolute proven fact.  Not continuously explaining that they are in fact based on absolutely proven fact.  :) 

I play on words here in the same way that mainstream science has played on the cosmos itself.  Einstein said gravity slows time, and that time slows reality.   And so time creates relativity.  And time has been measured and tested for over a hundred and twenty years now, with the results made to fit the idea that it was really there.

BUT.., because of the many puzzles, paradoxes, and problems, my solution was to remove the non-provable concept of time... 

To accept that gravity slows reality directly.  And that relativity is a physical phenomenon.  Not an abstraction.   When we did that we found that everything fell into place by itself.  Way more than I had ever expected...  We seem to have the answer to everything.  I know, a big claim.  But read for yourself.  I think you will agree it all makes sense.

My one question is.., when mainstream science finds things like multiple universes, worm holes, time travel, and that we are projections from a black hole, being extrapolated from the current idea of time.., ideas that most science doesn't really believe, why is it that they still do believe the rest of that very same erred theory puts forth.  How can they continue to believe only the parts they like and want to believe, and ignore the rest...?  I leave it to you to think for yourself. Please pick a subject and read on.