FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

The Cosmos Reconsidered is a website and book that attempts to answer all cosmological questions correctly with absolutely known, proven, and commonly used elsewhere classic physical physics based science. The true physics that has been beat on and hammered out over thousands of years... This chapter is aimed at answering all the so called mysteries of the cosmos. What has previously been totally unknown, totally misunderstood, and on up to being complete fairy tales. All of them tied directly to everything else through the EM field of gravity.

[MATH]

[QUESTION] Does Math 'prove' anything.?

[ANSWER] Math was was created by man. Which means it is already limited to man's ability to think and comprehend. It can not handle infinity., and doesn't understand relativity... Then we plug in bad posits such as 'time' for it to use in it's calculations. Is there any wonder on why it keeps coming up with all the dumb stuff..? Like telling us there are multiple universes, instead of multiple 'visible' universes. Each one contained within the one and only infinite cosmos we all know and love. Each one occupied by alien cosmologists who are trying'in slightly different ways' to figure out what's going on out there too.

Math only tells us what we tell it to say... We make up symbols to represent what we think we know. Then keep plugging them in until it comes up with some ridiculous answer that resonates with the people doing the plugging.

So then they say non-intuitive is an ok way to go... That the cosmos isn't required to make sense. What..? lmao... Of course it is. That's what real science is supposed to be doing. Experimentation, falsification, real physics. Not some dumb ass idea that math is intelligent. It was made to measure and plot what we see here in our particular 'at rest'.., not to *prove* anything.

I often wonder about how these people are supposed to be understanding what they say is not understandable.. Me thinks there just are not enough asylums in the world to hold them.. They're still out there walking the streets.

[CMBR]

[QUESTION] What is CMBR

[ANSWER] CMBR is a cosmic sized version of the TSE.

In the toy version of the twin slit here on earth, there are two sources of rather intense light that mix with each other on the way to the back wall. They create the light and dark bars on that wall.., and if you were to put an antenna to convert that interference pattern into sound you would hear a raspy buzz.

On the larger scale, with the earth being the back wall, and all the galaxies being the light sources that come to earth are the equivalent to many many slits sending light waves to earth, the back wall. They all form a much more complex interference pattern that we can hear with our phone wires and other 'antennas'.

Because there are so many sources of very weak light we hear a softer smoother hiss that we call white noise.
And CMBR. :/

It is in fact cosmic radiation, but it certainly is just a natural phenomenon and not from any never happened Big Bang.

[DARK MATTER]

[QUESTION] What is Dark Matter

[ANSWER] Every star in every galaxy is tearing apart their atoms with their ongoing nuclear explosions... They spew out all the bits..; electrons, protons, neutrons, and more, as what we call solar wind from our own sun.

They're sent out in all directions from our sun. Those that reach earth take an average of three days to get to us and at times they give us trouble with our communications. But what happens to them after they pass..? Those bits have mass after all. They do not just vaporize. They do not accumulate in some cosmic graveyard for ripped apart atoms. The real answer is that those bits with their charges simply attract and find each other again. They come together to form new atoms. An electron and proton connect to form hydrogen at first and continue becoming 'heavier' from there.

That process of growing larger is very easily explainable too. Involving another totally misconstrued and so called 'force' of the cosmos. The backward idea of Atomic decay. Just another version of atoms being destroyed.? Wrong..! It's not happening. How long would the cosmos last if all it was doing was *destroying* itself..??

Atom decay is actually the very needed process of atoms rebuilding. Mainstream has another one backwards. Take for instance c_14 used in carbon dating. Where a neutron becomes more positive to stand in while waiting an as yet still missing proton.. We know neutrons can become more positive or negative as required to keep their atoms balanced.

But back to those newly formed single atoms. Obviously we can't *see* them but we do register all the gravity they're producing. The gravity that is seen coming from within the galaxies that are supplying the raw material for those new atoms to form..? But, because we humans with our extremely limited senses can't see them., mainstream calls them 'mysterious'. I guess that's all it takes for mainstream. lol

Those invisible atoms then attract each other and eventually form objects that can be seen.., like dust, nebulae, rocks, planets and finally new stars, to start the whole process over again.

Does anyone believe those large *visible* things that we can see just pop out of nowhere, full-blown from nothing..?? Wanna bet that can't happen..?

There is no magic. The cosmos recycles itself. It must if it is to remain eternal... :/

So was that so tough...? If you don't believe it please tell me where it goes wrong ok..?

[THE T.O.E.]

[QUESTION] What is the T.O.E.

[ANSWER] Here is the theory of everything.

Actually it's not just a 'theory'. Every part of it is backed up with well known, proven, and commonly used elsewhere classic physics science. It cannot be falsified. There is no need for GR, SR, ST, QT, or any other of the conflicting brain farts that have come along recently.

The math everypne uses is pretty flawed but we're keeping it simple. Just two functions.

*********
vm = e
a α (1/v)
*********
v - velocity
m - mass (weight of atom(s))
g - gravity
a - aging rate
*********

'Gravity' strength is developed by the atom according to its velocity and mass.
(If there was no velocity there would be no gravity.)

'Aging' rate is an atom's rate of operation inversely proportional to velocity.
(Including contraction according to it's own inward attracting gravity.)

As an atom's nucleus increases velocity it causes the electrons to lag behind further and further, creating longer spiral and oval orbits taking longer to complete. Ergo, slowing the internal operation of the atom. Slowing all they comprise at that velocity's aging rate. Iron rusting, humans growing older, etc. Aka changing the inertial state of reference we call being 'at rest'.

When an atom’s neutrons sense this distancing they become more positive to hold the electrons closer.

his is the additional gravity production, and electrons 'being held closer' is the size reduction.

In a nutshell: Faster moving objects attract slower moving objects. Fast flowing rivers attract the more stationary granite cliff atoms to follow.., and so on.

This is of course 'relativity'. Which is tied directly to the conservation of energy.

The faster things travel the slower they run, the smaller they become, the more gravity they produce, with the 'perception' of increased mass,

All as seen from 'another' slower inertial frame of 'at rest'.

As with our moon with its perceived volume being 1/80th of the earth while its gravity is a full 1/6th.

Or with time zones. Each one narrower and rotating slower from the equator to the poles.

From over 1000 miles wide at the equator to just 2-1/2 ft wide just 60 ft from either pole.

Each 'at rest' running in their own velocity determined relativistic hallucination.

Where everyone believes they are stable and fixed, cause their floors are not moving and all their variously contracted rulers are still twelve inches long, to them..!

Because they are contracted too.

The math is just off the top of my head. So I'm open to anyone simplifying it. lol

[THE STRONG FORCE]

[QUESTION] What is the Strong Force..?

[ANSWER] There is no strong force. The so called force that is supposed to be holding all the repelling protons together in an atom's nucleus does not exist. It is well known that Mother Nature does not create cookie cutter duplicates. Snowflakes, finger prints, leaves, fractals... So it is in the nucleus of an atom where all protons have slight differences in positivity from all the others. The one with more is positive to one with less.., and the one with less is negative to one with more. They attract each other within each nucleus, arrange themselves in a pecking order, and curl into a ball with most at the center. Voila..! They hold themselves together. Just like a common bar magnet does.., without exploding. No strong force necessary.

How else would they have come together in the first place to form a nucleus.., with their super explosive repulsion preventing it... Before the so called strong force was there to supposedly to keep them together.

People just need to think about things a little deeper.

[THIRD POLAR FILTER]

[QUESTION] How does the 3rd filter allow light to pass after being blocked by the 1st two.?

[ANSWER] The basic idea is similar to inputting signals to a CRT. Inputting two of the same frequency that are 180 degs out of phase will result in a flat line. Which of course will be the equivalent to not being seen. Introducing a third input will show up on the screen as if the first two were not there at all.

As for polar filters themselves, they are not exactly 'sharp'. They do not just pass a sliver of spectra that are just a few wave lengths wide. Each polar filter passes visible wavelengths that fall within a much wider bell curve... So two bell curves turned to peak at 0 degrees and 90 degrees will equate to being out of phase, but their skirts will be overlapping between them at 45 degs. To keep it simple lets just say they will overlap at 50 percent amplitude at 45 degs.. This point will then only have half its peak canceling ability. The fist two still cancel each other's lower amplitudes out., but when a third filter is turned to 45 degs., it presents a full strength amplitude bell curve. Which will overcome the lower level's cancellation and it will come through at the 50 percent amplitude that wasn't blocked. .

[RED SHIFT AND COSMIC EXPANSION]

[QUESTION] Does Red Shift explain Cosmos Expansion?

[ANSWER] No... Because there is no expansion. The idea that it was expanding just came from a surface observation.. That Hubble found red shift in light coming from distant galaxies. Not much in depth thinking applied to that one.. :/ Because there is a well known second explanation for Red Shift that does not require distancing. It is known that EM spectra slowly lose their high end wave lengths as they come to us from distance galaxies. This causes those the rest of the spectra below to be longer on average. That is the red shift that Hubble found. Which has nothing to do with the light's sources leaving us.There is no cosmos expansion.

[CARBON DATING]

[QUESTION] How does Carbon Dating work?

[ANSWER] Carbon Dating is not accurate at all. In fact it gives a slightly increased reading for the same duration event at each latitude going north or south of the Equator, compared to that same event happening at the Equator. This has to do with the same proven classic physics cause of relativity that everything in the cosmos runs on. The conservation of energy. Where the higher an object's velocity is, the slower it operates or ages. Conversely, the slower any object moves, the faster it operates or ages. This is the case with many examples right here on earth that mainstream and most humans cannot comprehend so they simply ignore it.

There are over a thousand miles across one time zone at the Equator.., so the earth is rotating at that 1000+ mph velocity there. At London for instance the earth is rotating at the mph of a single time zone which is only about 350 miles aross. So now, if one were to place 60 markers equally spaced across the time zone of London, and the same across the same time zone at the Equator.., and drew lines from each to the appropriate other.., one would soon see that the people in London have to walk, talk, drive, think, and do everything else needed in life much faster than they need to be physically done at the Equator, just to stay in sync.

This of course applies to everything at these times zones. Everything has to be smaller.., as in Lorentz's contraction. Although contraction is inward from all directions., not just in the forward direction as he stated with his line of thinking.

'Everything' of course includes those ancient remains found in norther China.., which have been aging at a much higher rate because of their much slower rotational velocity. The carbon dating does record the correct aging but the problem comes in when we apply that higher reading to the same calendar year that was used for Lucy, found much closer to the Equator. They do not include the off-set that would correct the relativistically inflated result that using our calendar comes up with.

This off-set can be determined easily by syncing two atomic clocks at the Equator and then to bring one of them to each of ten or whatever number of latitudes north or south, that would give enough information to plot the off-set needed for every latitude in between. .

Each of these individual measurements would require that the atomic clock be set on an equivalent gravity strength as the one at the Equator., and to be left in place for a month or so.., before being returned to the Equator for comparison with that clock. The traveling clock will show a significant number of higher tick tocks, clicks, or whatever atomic clocks give for readings. That difference would be how much faster those measured latitudes are aging than the Equator.., and our globally common calendar years.

[VENTURI AND BERNOULLI EFFECTS]

[QUESTION] How can the same mass of fluid flow through a smaller and smaller opening depending on it's velocity.

[ANSWER] This has to do with velocity causing contraction of mass but a more detailed explanation will follow shortly.

[BLACK HOLES]

[QUESTION] Do Black Holes actually esist..?

[ANSWER] No.! Quasars have long been suspected of creating galaxies. The centers are actually burned out Quasars. A more detailed explanation will be coming shortly.

[TRANSISTORS]

[QUESTION] How did Transistors come about.

[ANSWER] Transistors are one of those discoveries I call Eureka moments. Similar to the discovery of Pennicillin. A totaly accidental discovery that was not looked for or expected. Transistors came out of the creation of semiconducting material. Someone just added a dopant to nom-conducting silicon and voila..! They found they had created a semi-conducting material.

This was certainly not something that needed a new physics. Especially Quantum physics which claims it was Quantum Mechanics that created it and made transistors possible. Not so... Not so at all.

[SOLAR PANELS]

[QUESTION]

[ANSWER]

[FLAMES]

[QUESTION] WHAT ARE FLAMES. WHAT DO THEY CONSIST OF.

[ANSWER]