The Cosmos Reconsidered
by Floyd E. Baker
(Updated November 2016)
The Cosmos Reconsidered book is actually not a ‘theory’.
It is a particular arrangement of known and previously proven facts, with common logic tying them together in a way that explains it alllll...
It contains and uses scientific fact, observation, and of course Occams Razor to answer the known ‘unknowns’ that stem from ‘time based’ thinking. Give us more and we will answer them too. All based on well tested physics.
Our ultimate fait accompli being what I am told is Nobel Prize material. Based on known science, we have a very detailed description of light. How it works. With no paradoxes or loose ends. See the Chapter on Light.
This book ignores the concept of time in the cosmos.., the theory part of Einstein’s view of the cosmos. The part of the current model that cannot be proven and really isn't necessary anyway. We see Einstein’s ‘time’ as a close analogy to how things happen but it’s not the real deal. To put it plain and simply, it is just screwing everything up. The initial purpose of this book was to replace time with it’s physical reality and we have done that. And to our pleasant surprise everything else then opened right up and took off on its own. The paradoxes were gone...!
It all boils down to just four very well established facts regarding the atom. Facts that when seen as a whole fully explain in logical and reasonable ways everything that happens in the cosmos. Everything we apply them to. Causality in a nutshell.
GRAVITY – INERTIA - CENTRIFUGAL FORCE – LIGHT – DARK MATTER – DARK ENERGY – TIME – RELATIVITY – TECTONIC PLATES – EARTH’S MAGNETIC FIELD, and everrything else.
These are all more or less mysteries to science. But well known and established facts actually do fit together, or entirely disappear, as we present them here. There are no mysteries... We're sure that most if not all the accepted results we have based this book on were obtained using scientific and logical means. But because the concept of time skews everything, none of it really ties fully together. Except through the use of 'special rules' made up to account for the problem areas.
We have eliminated or replaced these special rules with known reality.
It being that...:
1. So called ‘gravity’ originates in the atom.. That what is called gravity is nothing more than the extremely balanced electrical attraction that exists between protons and electrons. That being the balancing between the repulsion of all atom’s positive proton nuclei from each other.., which is countered and limited by the attraction electrons have to their own atom’s positive proton neuclei., but also the attraction they have to ALL OTHER atom’s protons besides their own.
This is what I believe is missing in most thinking. It is most certainly the network of electrons working together that hold all atom’s protons from repulsing each other beyond the state of the balanced charges. This balanced state of repulsion and attraction creates the three dimensional grid of electrons that you find in copper or any other element you can mention. Finer details on the workings of ‘edges’, and ‘non-solids’ further on in the book...
2. An atom's mass and resultant ‘gravity’ (electrical charge) goes up or down depending on its velocity through space.
3. An atom's internal *physical operating speed* or *rate of aging*, not ‘time’, is inversely proportional to it's velocity through the cosmos. Ergo, conservation of energy...
4. Electrons traveling further from the atom’s nucleus in irregular or eliptical orbits cause that atom’s nuclei to become slightly more positive in the various apogee directions. Many people believe this is simply 'polarization' which has no net effect. But we will explain more in the Chapter on the Atom with scientifically known fact that it can and does become more positive. That neutrons can become protons being one clue.
In this book we try to keep it simple, accepting what is seen, known, and proven, without projecting our own imagined ideas into the outcome. We let the findings of science guide us instead. And they have. Because at this point what science has been able to measure and know is telling us enough that we can get much closer to the truth than possible 100 years ago. Keeping Occam's Razor in mind at all times.
For the record.., Occams’s razor is the ultimate rule for finding the truth. By choosing the simplest workable explanation for whatever is to be understood.
The cosmos consists of atoms and the parts to build more atoms. That's pretty much it. There is no time in the cosmos. Just atoms operating with the four points we have listed above. That is our one and only correction to the current model. But with that change there are many perception changes and recalculations that need to be made. They're just rocks out there you know..? Einstein was wrong. We need to start over.
Our contention and what we will show is that atoms are simply moving about, and they will continue to move about, accumulate, and disburse in their respective ways. The cosmos does not have a schedule to keep nor does it require time as we use it here on earth.., nor does it bend or fold, as suggested in some rather simple minded science based TV shows. Everything simply moves as guided by the cosmos GPS... The ‘Gravity’ Positioning System. There are no folds or 'worm holes' to take us from the Milky Way to Andromeda in a flash. Using ‘t’ in the formulas is what brings on those ideas. A lot of atoms have simply come together using gravity to form suns, planets, and us... But it was all accidental. They never needed a ‘time’ to schedule their meetings. They only needed a potential difference...
So here is our explanation of what is real, in plain everyday English. Everything that follows is to the best of my knowledge proven, very logical and/or accepted reality. Except for imagined ‘time’ which Einstein injected into our cosmos and reality. The book contains few if any suppositions.. It only asks that you cut some slack with the ‘terminology’ or our way of looking at something that is otherwise believed to happen another way.., if my way still works *just as well*...
Otherwise explain why or how what I am saying *cannot be*. Please don't just over rule my thinking with yours. All this said with the idea that there’s more than one way to skin a cat. As in 2+2=4, 3+1=4, with mine being 4+0=4. Aka, Occam's razor...
There are no exotic theories or otherwise of my own.
Everything is already proven.., to the best of my knowledge.
Going with my (Non)-Theory...
The cosmos does not run according on time, nor does it use space-time.
It runs on something else...
Electromagnetism... Aka ‘Gravity’..! It being nothing more than the electrical attraction between negative and positive particles
Atoms, and therefore everything they comprise in the cosmos, each run at their own internal operating speed, or rate of aging, depending on their own particular inertial frame of reference. Single atoms and groups traveling together form more or less common inertial frames of reference, which relate specifically to their particular physical aging rate.., either being faster or slower than other atoms in other frames. Every atom in a group has its own ‘gravity’ strength, but the group takes on an average as measured from the center out because they are all moving at basically the same velocity. Atoms that comprise the various inertial frames take longer to do their thing at one velocity than they do at a slower velocity. This is all still Einstein btw. Simply minus time where he thought it was needed.. It wasn’t.! Time’s imagined role has always been carried out by ‘gravity’ alone. The strength of electjrical charges combined in larger bodies. Which is the true and direct causative agent of the rate change...
Again, conditions and speeds change continuously throughout the cosmos so an atom's rate of aging constantly changes too. Their running speed governed by the balancing out with the electromagnetic (gravitational) soup of the cosmos, moment by moment, as they travel through it. The attraction they continuously create themselves by their velocity, along with that which they perceive from other atoms and in total, the cosmos around them. It’s all one big balancing act... Every ATOM is always at the exact center of its own universe.
Applying that fact changes every unknown to simplicity itself.
Gravity, both external (attraction) and internal (velocity), controls their individual internal operating speeds. Causng atoms to age faster or slower, to live faster and shorter, or slower and longer, than others. There is physical relativity. There is NO space-time...
Atoms can run faster or slower. Time can not compress nor stretch.
Read on for the particulars...
And thank you for your interest...