The Cosmos Reconsidered
                                             by Floyd E. Baker

                                                                            CHAPTER  7


There are many attempts to describe what happens in the cosmos. 
But they never seem to explain the ‘why’ very well.

Here's one example that's been floating around for at least 60 years.

Twenty Year Spacehip Voyage

There is this imagined space ship that blasts off from earth and travels through the cosmos for twenty years at say half the speed of light.  Its passengers grow older at the expected rate, their clocks and calendars all registered the correct amounts of days and months, several women became pregnant and delivered in the normal nine of those space ship months, and all else went on normally too.

On their return to earth they discovered that everyone they knew had died and that one hundred years had passed since they took off. 


The earth had continued at its ‘at rest’ state, and the ship did likewise with its much slower ‘at rest’ state.  That is, because of the ship’s higher velocity the atoms of the ship, the clocks, the people, even the rusting of that ship all took longer than those same things would have taken back on earth.

Einstein's Explanation.., developed around the faith based concept of time.

In a nutshell:

* * * Atoms run slower because time stretches with increased gravity.

Baker's Explanation.., developed around physical and known conditions of the cosmos.

In a nutshell:

* * * Atoms operate and run slower with increased velocity.

The conservation of energy.

What sounds more logical..?   More elegant..?

Yes..!   Thank you.  :)

Einstein stuck time between speed and the operation of atoms.    Why..?

Because he didn’t know what we know now.  In describing relativity he was actually ignoring relativity.  That it was something else besides we ourselves who change in the various frames we’re in.    The concept of time is a needless middleman and does nothing but skew the logic and math that is built around it.

Relativity is indeed a proven fact., but there is no fabric of space-time.  It's more a very controlled gravity soup that atoms traverse.., where their aging speeds are inversely proportional to their momentum, their velocity, mass, and acquired gravity strengths.   It is all also known as the conservation of energy.  

So think about it.  Every part of the earth is growing older at different rates.  Those  dated fossils and artifacts found nearer the equator are  much older in actual sun rotation years than they are carbon dated to be.   Every object on earth is  aging at its own specific rate, determined by the speed of the earth’s rotation at that latitude.   And yet  everyone in every frame perceives themselves to be ‘normal’.  In fact every atom is aging at some slightly different speed than those around it that in total comprise an average at rest state.  

Relativity is not time stretching.  It is that the faster an atom moves through the cosmos, the slower it operates and ‘ages’ within itself.   Physical slowing. 

And everything is made of atoms.   

Gravity is simply a by-product.  Proportional to that speed and needed to control and balance the movements in the cosmos but it has nothing to do with relativity as such.  See the chapter on Gravity.

That is what Einstein missed.   It has nothing to do with imagined ‘time’....

So.., that’s about it...

Thanks for making it through this far.., so far.