* * * NEW * * *

New Thoughts and Suppositions... 

But still based on pure Science...


We’re going now for Occam's Razor and the quest for a Unified Theory.  

This is a draft.  Just forming the words as the logic comes together.., and it's looking good.   Please hang in until you read it all.   I'll go step by step.  


Just as things became very clear with no loose ends when we dumped the imagined concept of time, we’re now taking on Gravity.., and ‘Equivalence’.   We're coming to see that Gravity is an imagined force, and not a true ‘separate’ one of it’s own.   It is already known by another name too.   Not that there are two 'similar' forces to be 'equivalent'.    There is only one, and it has been given two names.   Gravity being the ‘other one’..  

What people have been going on are simply various POV’s.  The true force is that which originates in the atom with it’s positive and negative charges.  It appears that one particular effect  or aspect of this electromagnetism force was given the name Gravity for the particular actions it caused in limited cases.  That of drawing other atoms together from single atoms to planet and sun sized accumulations.    Several sub categories of that misunderstood attraction aspect called ‘gravity’  were then named Centrifugal Force, Inertia, Centripetal Force, etc. when in fact everything **IS** the otherwise known force of electromagnetism and not anything else.

What is called Gravity, in and of itself, is still not very well understood.   Here’s just one reference to gravity and the weirdness that comes from a total lack of understanding.  

http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/article/six-weighty-facts-about-gravity

But we see it now as nothing more.., an understatement for sure.., than the already known attraction between protons and electrons.  The positive and negative charges that exist in every atom.   ‘Gravity’ simply being an amplification of that attraction caused by the accumulation of untold trillions of trillions of atoms coming together to form larger and larger objects., which then attract the atoms in other accumulations, like the earth attracting you and I...
  
There are things to be worked out.   One being the particular aspects of iron.  The seemingly separate aspect of ‘ferris’ atoms.    That being a super form of attraction that  we call ‘magnitism.  So we are putting ‘ferris’ attraction on the back burner until we get closer to the overall workings of the electromagnetic force called ‘gravity’ here on earth and in the cosmos in general...
 
In any case here is what seems to be the case as I and currently misinterpreted but true science now sees it...

In researching and writing the book it was not realized until later on just how close we already were in the beginning  in coming to this conclusion.   But it becomes more and more clear as we delve deeper into it.   We are opening another door.   

There are things to be worked out...   One being the particular aspects of iron.  The seemingly separate aspect of ‘ferris’ atoms.    It being an super form of what we call ‘ magnitism’.   So we are putting ferris magnetism aside as a separate issue, until we get closer to the overall workings of ‘gravity’ here on earth and in the cosmos in general...


Always looking for Occam's Razor.., I asked myself what actually could replace gravity.  Gravity itself having no real explanation other than we can feel something pulling on us.  So how about the equivalence.    EMF, magnetism and other such names.   Differing electrical charges pulling on each other.  Is gravity nothing more than an accumulated average of negative electron charges pulling on the accumulated average of positive nuclei...?    Can electrical charges be the one and only force in the cosmos.      I think so...

The structure of our cosmos, it's ability to physically be what it is, including the so called force of 'gravity', may simply boil down to the interaction between charges within each atom, which then extends beyond to affect other atoms.    ‘Other’  meaning all other atoms in the entire cosmos to some degree.

Again this is based on many already known scientific facts.   We’re going on what can be read elsewhere and otherwise known to be logical and true.    There is nothing here that is not already known...    It is all known..    It's just not fully understood or interpreted correctly...   That is why we are ‘reconsidering’ all of it...  . 

Atoms tend to arrange themselves in a three dimensional grid for one.  Equally spaced from each other.  Colloidal I believe is the word.   That because the nucleus of atoms are positive and positives repel each other, they will tend to space themselves as far from each other as possible.   Within any container  they will disperse equidistant to each other as space allows.     With the idea that they are all equally positive...   They each having the same number of protons  They hold themselves in place as it were.   Suspended an equal distance from each other. So that explains the atomic grid like structure of any material.   So far so good?


Now for the 'container' part.   The positive nuclei are kept from expanding away from each other beyond a certain distance by all the negative charges coming from ALL the electrons in the  neighboring atoms..   Especially from each of six directions of the grid around them.., but also those  further out.., including the entire cosmos.     Each attracted to their own atom's positive nuclei, as well as to all other positive nuclei around it.   

An atom (call it  A) has its electrons attracted inward to it's center., but they are held from closing the gap by the positive pulling away from A’s center by all the positive charges coming from the six closest atom’s nuclei in the grid structure around it... (B through G) and of course the weaker but the many more  positive nuclei further out.      It is a balanced mesh of attraction.   Like a net holding all the nuclei from getting away.    The particular maximum distance between positive charges is controlled by a container of negatively charged energy.     Each  neighboring atom's positive nuclei will be pulling other atom's electrons outward and preventing them from joining their own particular nuclei.   And and all those electrons will be keeping all the positive nuclei from expanding away any further too. 

As for the outside edges of any solid, to us, atomic structure, such as copper wire.., where there are no atoms of that element beyond the outside 'edge' of that wire.  We will see a loosening of the grid structure.    There will not be the one of six most effective copper nuclei beyond the edge holding it inward so that last copper atom can force itself further from the body of copper.  The spacing will become slightly larger between the copper atom's nuclei at the wire's surface...  But there are other atoms beyond that edge of course.., such as those creating the air around the wire.   It's only a matter of density and mass.    This same idea will apply throughout the spectrum of material densities...  Gases, liquids, and solids...  Each with various densities depending on the elements involved...    In a 'transition area', there is electron mixing and transference from one to the other's atoms, in either direction, in every case....   From liquid, to the liquid's glass container, to the air around the container...       As with the wire, this happens all the time throughout the wire, but much more so at the surface.   The  transition area.., and in either direction   

From what is the more loosely or tightly  ‘balanced’ state, to the other, within the transition space.    Where electrons can and do flow among and between these different elemental atoms.

The wording is not yet formalized but the gist of it I think is pretty well explained here...

http://matse1.matse.illinois.edu/metals/prin.html

This then seems to explain how and why copper oxide is formed... and why electric current in a wire tends to flow more through the surface of a wire rather than equally through the entire body of it.  The electrons on the outer surface are in a looser environment so when a positive charge is placed on one end of the wire they are more easily attracted to it than those of the more central body of the wire would be... 

It is the electrons encircling each atom's nuclei that holds the structure together by attracting all the nuclei of surrounding atoms., while balancing out the atom’s positive charges which keep their particular distance from each other

They are in fact kept from joining their own protons and destroying themselves in the process .   Just as with earth’s satellites do not fall to earth.  They being pulled outward by the positivity of the cosmos that equals the inward pull of the earth.... 


I see many of the electrons moving hither and yon within the grid.  Jumping from atom to atom.  Creating ions and isotopes as they arrive and leave an atom.   Causing rust and corrosion and other reactions...   I still see them doing irregular paths around their own nucleus, for the same reasons.., but now I see their negative charges as being what increase or decrease as well as protons change their  positive strength, as required for the electrons to hold themselves to the nucleus and stay balanced within the positive charges of the atoms around them too.   So this is the gravity that exists and is compounded to some degree by all atoms in the cosmos.   Each combining with atoms that are similar to themselves to make totally balanced elementary structures...  Gold, iron, oxygen, etc... but in total producing totally balanced attraction to all others.
 


Electric current through a wire is caused by a more positive charge, a lack of electrons, being placed at one end of a conductor, causing the ‘looser’ negative electrons on the surface  to flow towards it, which moves the positive charge, a lack of electrons, to the opposite end...  Which if not supplied with more electrons, will become maxed and the electron flow will stabilize at that point.   This is what happens in a capacitor and is common knowledge.    If a negative charge is then applied to that opposite end,  to replace the missing electrons as needed, they will readily jump from atom to atom to reach the positivity at the top end...  Current will flow...  
 


And of course a magnetic field will develop around it.., as it does around the earth.
But that seems to be another chapter...      It is obviously part and parcel to electrons being carriers of the EMF and of course producing visible light...   Electrons being ‘messenger photons’ as they are...      Much more reading and thinking to be done.    Magnetism, loadstones, ferrous vs non ferrous metals, etc... 

 

    Thanks for the interest...   I’m learning...  lol